The Tape
Was Allen Iverson better than Tim Duncan?
Allen Iverson, 1996-2010, against Tim Duncan, 1997-2016. The numbers levelled to one league, then the call.
Method, stated plainly: scoring is adjusted to a league averaging 114 points per team per game. Rebounds and assists are printed as they were recorded, with the league scoring rate beside them, because a rebound in 1962 came out of a different number of missed shots and we will not pretend one multiplier fixes that. Career lines for active players run through 2024-25.
What the numbers say
Adjusted to a league averaging 114 points a game, Allen Iverson is the bigger scorer: 38.8 a game in 2005-06 against 30.4 for Tim Duncan in 2001-02. That is a real gap of 8.4 points, not an era illusion — Allen Iverson's league averaged 97 and Tim Duncan's averaged 95.5.
Tim Duncan wins the glass by 9.5 rebounds a game (12.7 to 3.2), which in his era meant standing in traffic rather than waiting for a long one.
Allen Iverson is the passer: 7.4 assists a game to 3.7, and that is the difference between running an offense and finishing one.
Allen Iverson: An MVP at 6 feet and 165 pounds, in the last era where hand-checking was legal. Tim Duncan: Five titles across 15 years with the same bank shot and no visible change in expression.
The numbers are free. The verdict is in the Vault.
13 Dossiers, every Dispatch ever sent, and the Tape. One payment, $39, yours for good. The archive keeps growing every morning after you have paid.
Every pairing in the file makes the call in writing, and pass holders read all of them.
5 Dispatches in the archive so far, and one more every morning. 14-day refund, no questions asked.
Read the file: Allen Iverson
The next argument
Get the Dispatch
One email a day: what happened last night, and the game, player or era from history it rhymes with. Four minutes at breakfast, free forever.
Free forever. One tap to leave.