The Tape
Was Karl Malone better than Patrick Ewing?
Karl Malone, 1985-2004, against Patrick Ewing, 1985-2002. The numbers levelled to one league, then the call.
Method, stated plainly: scoring is adjusted to a league averaging 114 points per team per game. Rebounds and assists are printed as they were recorded, with the league scoring rate beside them, because a rebound in 1962 came out of a different number of missed shots and we will not pretend one multiplier fixes that. Career lines for active players run through 2024-25.
What the numbers say
Adjusted to a league averaging 114 points a game, Karl Malone is the bigger scorer: 33 a game in 1989-90 against 30.5 for Patrick Ewing in 1989-90. That is a real gap of 2.5 points, not an era illusion — Karl Malone's league averaged 107 and Patrick Ewing's averaged 107.
Away from scoring they are nearly the same player on paper: 11.1 and 10.9 rebounds, 2.8 and 2.2 assists. The separation is in what their teams asked of them, not what they could do.
Karl Malone: Second on the all-time scoring list for 19 years, on the same pick-and-roll run 30,000 times. Patrick Ewing: A 21-and-10 center for 15 years who was the second-best player in almost every series that mattered.
The numbers are free. The verdict is in the Vault.
13 Dossiers, every Dispatch ever sent, and the Tape. One payment, $39, yours for good. The archive keeps growing every morning after you have paid.
Every pairing in the file makes the call in writing, and pass holders read all of them.
5 Dispatches in the archive so far, and one more every morning. 14-day refund, no questions asked.
Read the file: Patrick Ewing
The next argument
Get the Dispatch
One email a day: what happened last night, and the game, player or era from history it rhymes with. Four minutes at breakfast, free forever.
Free forever. One tap to leave.